Quote of the Day (22/09/09)
“Never judge a book by its movie.”
J W Eagan
[Quote supplied by the Quotations Page]
I think this depends on which came first, actually. I’ve found that if the movie is adapted from a novel, the novel is generally better; likewise, the original TV show or film is usually better than any novelisation.
But there are plenty of films and books which don’t fit either sweeping generalisation (J W Eagan’s or mine). Peter Jackson’s films of The Lord of the Rings were of course fantastic, doing justice to the source material, and I have hopes for Guillermo del Toro with The Hobbit as well. And the TV show True Blood takes Charlaine Harris’s excellent Sookie Stackhouse novels and turns them into something richer and darker without losing the spirit of the originals.
I’ve also read a few novels which were decent spin-offs of good films – though they were usually written by well-known writers.
There are films too, which are actually much better than their source material – the most recent was Angels and Demons, at which I was pleasantly surprised. OK, it wasn’t perfect, but it wasn’t as clunky as the novel, and it was massively better than the film of The Da Vinci Code. (I still have an aversion to Tom Hanks though.)
Anyway, anyone got any other suggestions for books or films/TV series which equal or surpass the originals?





