Search terms #3

Posted on May 17th, 2008 in waffle by Catherine

Here are some more of the words and phrases which produce my blog when people search for them:

  • why, commas are important (or in the case of Google search, why commas make no difference, since this term brought up a post of mine entitled Why commas are important)
  • weasel phrases (no, I have no idea either unless they were looking for that well-known quote about eagles soaring but weasels not getting sucked into jet engines)
  • thank you for reviewing the documentation (no, thank you)
  • tautology word processor (and I have no idea on this one either, but it sounds like something I’d like to have)
  • sharp go to sleep (if you insist…)

 

Review: The Book Thief by Markus Zusak

Posted on May 15th, 2008 in reviews by Catherine

I decided to do something different with this review. I knew that one of my frequent commenters, Ken Armstrong, had read The Book Thief too, and since I was having trouble writing a review but did want to write one, I asked him to collaborate.

By the way, if anyone else wants to collaborate on a book review like this, let me know which book you’d like to have a go at, and I’ll see what can be done! (No Harlequin/Mills & Boon, please, but most other stuff is far game.)

Markus Zusak - The Book ThiefCatherine’s rating:  8 out of 108 out of 10
Ken’s rating: 7 out of 107 out of 10

It’s January 1939 in Nazi Germany, eight months before the outbreak of World War Two. Liesel Meminger is travelling to Mölking, a town near Munich, to be fostered by Rosa and Hans Hubberman. During the train journey that she’s making with her mother and younger brother, her brother dies; during his funeral, Liesel steals her first book, The Gravedigger’s Handbook.

The Book Thief tells the story of Liesl over the next five years: her new parents, wardrobe-shaped, bad-tempered Rosa and calm, accordion-playing Hans who teaches her to read her first stolen book; her best friend Rudy; the poverty-stricken life she leads in wartime Germany; and perhaps most importantly, the books she steals and the Jew in the basement and the words he shares with her.

Technical Writing Tuesdays: Applying review comments

Posted on May 13th, 2008 in technical writing by Catherine
This entry is part 6 of 6 in the series Technical Writing Tuesdays

A lot of the suggestions in this article will depend on how well you know your reviewers.  If it’s their first time reviewing your documents, or you have a professional relationship with them rather than a friendly one, then you may need to compromise on more of the less important matters. Stick to your guns on the ones that you really care about though!

If your reviews have been done properly, you should receive two types: a technical review and a peer review.  Let’s discuss the technical review first, as it’s easier to deal with.

Technical Review Comments
In general, you won’t be the technical expert; whoever has reviewed your document should be. So, it’s a simple matter - take their suggestions for changes and updates, and apply them.

Of course, you might have described behaviour you yourself observed, or you might have conflicting comments from two or more technical reviewers. In these cases, you need to make sure that the corrections are, well, correct. Talk to your subject matter experts (SMEs) again; show them what you did and make sure that the software or hardware really is supposed to work like that - if it isn’t, someone may need to raise a bug!

Peer Review Comments
These can be harder to deal with as they apply to your writing itself. If it’s a spelling error or a formatting correction, go ahead and fix the problem. But if your reviewer has suggested changes to the wording or structure of the information in the document, you may need to think about them.

And it’s all too easy to think ‘well, I’m right’… and even if you can see their point, it’s easy to take this kind of review personally. Don’t. As discussed in the guest post by Roberto Villegas, Taking Bad Reviews Like a Pro, you can’t please all of the people all of the time, and what you think might be grammatically correct and structurally sound, another reader might not. It’s also very easy to get too close to your own work. Take a step back and assess it as your reviewer might have.

Sometimes, of course, your reviewer will just be wrong. Ignore their comments if you want, but bear in mind that if you submit the document to them for review again, they’ll just flag up the same stuff.

It’s far better to discuss the review comments with the reviewer where there is possible conflict - and this also applies if, as I mentioned can happen with technical reviews, you’ve had conflicting comments from reviewers. Be polite. Ask why they wanted something changed - good reviewers will have already said why in their review comments, but most won’t. If you think your way is better, be prepared to explain yourself. And be prepared to compromise.

————–
If you have any questions or comments about this article, or any suggestions for future posts, please comment on this post or email me via my contact form.
Technical Writing Tuesdays: index of posts

Happy faces

Posted on May 12th, 2008 in waffle by Catherine

Some of you may see your gravatars (globally recognised avatar) appearing next to your comments. That’s because I’m clever and have finally figured out a) the correct WordPress plugin to use and b) how to set my own gravatar.

Although I had an avatar at WordPress.com (where blogs are hosted on their servers), I couldn’t get that to populate across to my own WordPress installation. Until I spotted something somewhere which directed me towards www.gravatar.com, where I could create an account and associate any number of email addresses with one or more gravatars.

So because I’m feeling clever (even if some of you are thinking ‘I did that ages ago’), I thought I’d share. Get your gravatar now, and have a happy face by your comments (or frowny face or random graphic which represents you in some other way)…

Finding the time

Posted on May 11th, 2008 in writing by Catherine

I am lousy at time management. I have zero self-discipline. I find it hard to make myself sit down and write no matter how much the words and ideas might run riot around my head, demanding to be put down in writing (or typing).

So how come I can manage to write 50,000 words every November? How come I can manage to make my work deadlines?

I think I’m basically a time-waster. I do have free time in my days, when I sit and play computer games, when I browse the net, when I drop Entrecards. I could read for a half-hour less each day and write instead. I could have a shower instead of a bath and use the time saved (because I do spend a lot of time in the bath when I have one, usually reading).

It’s not really a problem finding time to write, I suppose. The hours are there, I can carve out chunks of time from other things to spend writing.

No, my problem is my motivation. I call myself a writer, I would like to become a published writer. I would love to actually finish one of my half-baked novels. I just can’t seem to get enough impetus to do so.

ARGH.

Anyway, suggestions and criticisms are welcome. Very welcome. I need one or more kicks up the arse, and I’m inviting you guys to apply them.

Guest Post: Taking Bad Reviews like a Pro, by Roberto Villegas

Posted on May 6th, 2008 in writing by Catherine

I’m delighted to announce my inaugural guest post, which comes from Roberto Villegas of Memoirs of an English Major. Roberto describes his blog as ‘a free form writing project, with a combination of memoirs, fiction, and journalistic writing’, and it always contains interesting pieces of writing about all sort of things in a mix of fiction and non-fiction. He’s currently looking for creative content of any sort to post as part of his Creative Content Fridays. (Hmm, I really should submit something…)

————

Any writer, I suppose, feels that the world into which he was born is nothing less than a conspiracy against the cultivation of his talent.”
James Baldwin

It’s an old adage that you can’t please all the people all the time and every so often, the phrase rears its ugly head with a negative review. It’s an inevitability that not everyone will think your work is gold, and some will tear it apart using language that may be better suited for the seedy bars in a Red Light district. Everyone experiences this and I’ve had my fair share of negative reviews. Here are a few tips that could help you take that negative and convert it to a positive.

1. Don’t panic
It’s my theory that every writer has gotten at least one negative response to their works. Not everyone fell head over heels for Moby Dick. It happens to even the best writers. So don’t panic if your work doesn’t hit it out of the park with everyone.
Remember that writing inspires emotion, some that may be unexpected. But it’s always good to note that even a negative reaction is better than none at all. It means that your work inspired someone to write a response, which means it got the reader to think, which is not a bad thing at all.

2. Don’t take it personally
It’s a first assumption that when a writer receives a negative review that it is attacking the writer. Sometimes this is the case, but for the most part reviewers are critiquing the work. It’s important to keep this in mind when you’re reading your reviews and to not take any of the reviews personally. It may be your baby, but once you put it out there, it’s fair game for anyone to judge, pick apart, and fully destroy. It may seem cruel, but it is the truth, so don’t take any of it personally. This tip alone will save you heartache and despair.

3. Respond, but with tact
As stated, once a work is out there, it’s fair game to judge. The same goes for reviews. This is entirely up to you, but feel free to comment back to a reviewer. It’s completely acceptable and may help you to convey what you are trying to get at, or to defend the fact that your work may not be complete. Do keep in mind that you must do this tactfully and not to resort to name calling or insulting. By doing so, it not only shows that you are a mature writer, but one that can “roll with the punches” and are completely ready to defend your work with a level of writing that the reviewer may not have expected. Show your depth of respect for the reviewer, but defend your position.

4. Correct the problems
Sometimes, the negative review is actually deserved. If you have a clear mind, you can tell when this is the case. By getting a bad review, you may find out what is wrong with the work and understand what needs to be fixed. If possible, try to fix the work to please not only the reviewer, but also the audience in question. Don’t write specifically to the reviewer, but use the negative energy and focus it to improve the work. Writing is a process and even the best written works need to be edited.

5. Don’t give up
It’s always disheartening when you get negative reviews, and some can’t take the reviews and quit. But don’t let these reviews force you to give up on a work. If you must walk away, don’t give up writing. Keep trying on different or switch up the pace. Writing is not a skill one gets overnight and it takes time to truly develop a voice. Remember to keep your chin up and keep on it, daily if need be.

Some reviewers can be down right cruel and show very little concern for your work, forgetting that even they have gotten bad reviews. Writing can be tough, but if you just remember these tips, you should be able to ride any negative critiques. Just keep a clear head, a stiff upper lip, and you should be fine. Always remember that writing is a process. Just remember to keep writing and that even a negative can be turned into a positive.

Happy trails!

Personal things

Posted on May 5th, 2008 in waffle by Catherine

I don’t normally post anything here that isn’t related to my reading or writing, but I’m making a brief exception this morning just to let you, my loyal readers and regular Entrecard droppers, know that I haven’t been around and won’t be around for a few more days due to a family bereavement. So no replies to comments or EC-dropping from me.

I do however have a guest post handily lined up for tomorrow from Roberto Villegas (Memoirs of an English Major), so I hope you all enjoy it and I’ll see you around in a couple of days.

Word of the Day (03/05/08)

Posted on May 3rd, 2008 in word of the day by Catherine

For once, I didn’t wait for a word to be emailed to me. I picked this word myself based on a minor incident this morning.

tautology noun
        a: needless repetition of an idea, statement, or word
       
b: an instance of tautology

This word was used by the brainy annoying kid in last week’s Doctor Who (Series 4: The Sontaran Stratagem) in an attempt to take the Doctor down a peg or two (didn’t work of course).  I was reminded of it this morning at the library, when the librarian didn’t at first understand my request for a PIN for their website - she thought at first I asked for a PIN, and then I clarified with “So I can request and renew books”, she replied, “Oh, you want a PIN number!”

Cue internal groan from Catherine.

OK, I admit to being guilty of commiting the act of tautology fairly frequently without realising it. But I’m a bit more aware of it at the moment.  There are other forms of tautology, of course, aside from the common ‘PIN number’, ‘ATM machine’ and ‘GPS system’ constructions, but I can’t think of any brilliant examples at the moment - anyone help me out here? :)

[Also, on a completely unrelated note, today's 'amusement at weird wording' came when I visited the farmer's market and noticed that the organics stall was selling 'organically reared sausages'. I just had a fun image in my head of lots of sausages with little legs, roaming pesticide-free across the hills.]

Next Page »